The Passion of Hussain

By Rannie Amiri
March 2004
Rarely
has controversy over a film simultaneously encompassed the religious,
social, and political spheres as has Mel Gibson's The Passion of the
Christ. The primary focus of the discussion has been on whether it
represents an accurate portrayal of Jesus’ last twelve hours, and if
so, if it qualifies as anti-Semitic. The participants in this
discourse, for the most part, have obviously been Christians and Jews.
The secular public did learn that the word passion refers to Jesus'
suffering during the crucifixion in the Christian account of events
(incidentally from where the word excruciating is derived), but can
equally apply to the suffering of any martyr.
Noticeably
absent from the debate were Muslims, who were happy for once to remain
on the sidelines. Not only do they not believe it was Jesus who was
crucified, but they deliberately avoid depicting the images of their
prophets in any context. Nearly coincident with the release of the film
was the start of the month of Muharram, the first month of the Islamic
lunar calendar.
This
is quite ironic, as will be discussed, since the first ten days of
Muharram are for Shi'a Muslims the most important days of the year,
commemorating what could be called The Passion of Hussain.
The
tenth day of Muharram, known as Aashura, marks the martyrdom of Imam
Hussain ibn Ali, the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad, in the year 680
A.D. on the plains of Karbala, Iraq. Briefly, Imam Hussain, his
immediate family and devoted companions, journeyed from Mecca towards
Iraq, to make a final stand against the tyrannical and corrupt ruler of
the Umayyad caliphate at the time, Yazid ibn Muawiyah. Totaling no more
than 72 in number, Imam Hussain and his supporters faced an army of
thousands. Languishing in the desert, the tale of Imam Hussain's
resistance to the army of Yazid, self-sacrifice in the face of
adversity, and unyielding perseverance against overwhelming numerical
odds ending in his brutal slaying, has been an inspiration to all Shi'a
Muslims throughout the ages (Shi'a Muslim, literally "the partisans of
Ali," so named for their support of Imam Ali - the father of Imam
Hussain and cousin to the Prophet Muhammad – to succeed the Prophet
after his death).
This
tragedy has been described by the Arab historian Al-Fakhri as follows:
"This
is a catastrophe whereof I care not to speak at length, deeming it
alike too grievous and too horrible. For verily, it was a catastrophe
than that which naught more shameful has happened in Islam...There
happened therein such a foul slaughter as to cause man's flesh to creep
with horror. And again I have dispersed with my long description
because of its notoriety, for it is the most lamented of catastrophes."

The
Passion of Hussain would thus be an appropriate designation for this
saga. Each year, the first ten days of Muharram culminating in Aashura,
are traditionally marked by Muslims of the Shi’a branch with
processions, gatherings for recitations of the tragedy,
self-flagellation as an _expression of mourning in some countries, and
passion plays re-enacting the event.
For
the first time in nearly 25 years, Shi'a Muslim pilgrims from many
different countries participated in the Aashura activities in Iraq
previously banned under the regime of Saddam Hussein. Quite erroneously
described by the media as a "celebration", "feast", or "festival,"
nearly 2 million of them converged on the holy city of Karbala where
the shrine of Imam Hussain is located, rivaling the number who perform
the annual Hajj pilgrimage in Mecca (which carries the now apparently
dated designation as the largest single gathering of humanity).
As
befitting the tragic day, death and destruction occurred on Aashura
this year, which fell on March 2nd of the Gregorian calendar, as
suicide bombers struck mourners in Karbala, Baghdad, and Pakistan.
Upwards of 180 were killed and 500 wounded in Iraq and 43 killed in
Quetta, Pakistan. Other attacks were fortunately pre-empted in Najaf
and Basra, Iraq during this same period.
Speculation
abounded as to who was behind these assaults, with most accusations
directed at Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the al-Qaeda affiliated mastermind
allegedly hiding Iraq, belonging to Ansar al-Islam, Ansar as-Sunna, or
whichever group claims him. It is improbable the bombings in Pakistan
were directly linked to those in Iraq, but still likewise carried out
by Sunni/Wahabi extremists, who bear historical enmity toward Shi'a
Muslims.
Knowing
that the attacks were likely orchestrated by Wahabis under the umbrella
organization of al-Qaeda seeking to foment sectarian divisions in Iraq
(as the purported letter by Zarqawi details as a strategy), Iraqis
instead rioted against American troops. They were furious at the lack
of security provided, and in a broader context, the lack of control
over Iraq's borders, which has allowed foreign operatives to continue
to infiltrate the country and carry out such assaults.
The
United States can thank, and not for the first time, Grand Ayatollah
Ali al-Sistani, spiritual leader for the vast majority of Iraq's 15
million Shi'a and a voice of moderation in an otherwise chaotic
political climate, for immediately calling for calm and unity among all
Iraqis.
Hence,
there were no revenge killings, reprisals, or rampages directed at
Iraq's minority Sunni Arab population. Should this have occurred, it
would have made Iraq's current situation appear placid.
The
United States should learn the lessons of Muharram, Aashura, and the
bombings of March 2nd: The Iraqi Arab Shi'a community and Ayatollah
Sistani should not be taken for granted in their temporary support of
the Coalition's occupation of post-war Iraq, nor their demands for free
elections. The patience this community has shown the United States, who
has tried to curb their influence in the Iraqi political landscape for
the unsubstantiated fear of the emergence of a theocratic state, is
rapidly coming to an end. If the United States continues to test these
limits, it will only play into the agendas of al-Zarqawi, al-Qaeda, and
all those amongst the Arabs who dread the rise of a democratic, Shi'a
led state, and ultimately seek its collapse.
Imam Jafar as-Sadiq, the Sixth Shi'ite Imam, in a well-known hadith or tradition, said:
"Every day is Aashura, and every land is Karbala."
The
United States would do well to study the narrative of Imam Hussain's
struggle and eventual martyrdom in resisting imposed injustice, lest
this hadith should change from that of a spiritual metaphor to one
borne out in reality.
Rannie
Amiri is an independent observer, commentator, and exponent of issues
dealing with the Arab and Islamic worlds. He welcomes your comments
at: rbamiri@yahoo.com